The Center for the Study of Scholastic Discipline

          reducing the school to prison pipeline
   Center for the Study of Scholastic Discipline

Ann Arbor Public Schools — Policy Analysis 2026

Grand Total
88 / 106
83.0%
Base Score
79 / 96
Extra Credit
9 / 10

Download complete evaluation

Score by Section

SectionScoreMaxNotes
Culturally Responsive Training68Notes
Clear & Consistent Policies68Notes
Restorative Justice Practices58Notes
Bias Awareness & Mitigation68Notes
Culturally Relevant Curriculum88Notes
Community Engagement & Collaboration88Notes
Professional Development on Equity & Inclusion68Notes
Mental Health & Trauma-Informed Practices88Notes
Data Collection & Analysis58Notes
Student Voice & Leadership68Notes
Equitable Access to Support Services88Notes
Continuous Evaluation & Improvement78Notes
Extra Credit910Notes

Suggestions to Improve the Score

Every item below its maximum, worst gap first, with the reviewer's own notes as the rationale.

Show suggestions (18)
  • 1.2 [Culturally Responsive Training]: Mentorship programs for culturally diverse staff — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The report lists plans to <cite index="69-2">Enhance programs to retain minority staff once hired (i.e., equity teams, affinity groups)</cite> and continue working with the AAEA Minority Affairs Committee, but no formalized, guaranteed mentorship program for all diverse staff is confirmed as mandatory district-wide.
  • 1.4 [Culturally Responsive Training]: Regular feedback/measurement on training effectiveness — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district administers an annual staff/student/family climate survey and uses survey data on hiring/retention, but no specific public evidence was found of systematic measurement of training-effectiveness itself, so this is rated as in-work.
  • 2.3 [Clear & Consistent Policies]: Staff training on consistent application — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Administrators have <cite index="19-4">already completed Restorative Practices Level 1 and Level 2 training</cite>, but a board candidate publicly noted "<cite index="129-8,129-9">what happens to one student does not necessarily happen to the other...I believe some of that inconsistency is the reason why you have a lot of high suspensions for young Black men</cite>," indicating consistency of applica…
  • 2.4 [Clear & Consistent Policies]: Centralized documentation of incidents/outcomes — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district presented a <cite index="30-6">six‑year analysis...showing district suspensions have risen since the pandemic</cite> to the board, but staff <cite index="30-9">committed to follow‑up with disaggregated and per‑student metrics</cite>, indicating the centralized incident/outcome documentation system is still being built out.
  • 3.1 [Restorative Justice Practices]: Restorative circles/conferences to repair harm — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Restorative Justice conferencing exists at some buildings (e.g., <cite index="21-7">Skyline's Restorative Justice protocol is universally recognized as a powerfully effective process of intervention, deescalating conflict</cite>), but the district's 2026 work plan calls to <cite index="64-8">systematize successful local programs such as peer mediation and restorative circles</cite>, showing i…
  • 3.2 [Restorative Justice Practices]: Staff training in restorative practices — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). <cite index="19-4,19-5">All building administrators have already completed Restorative Practices Level 1 and Level 2 training, and we will continue to deepen this work by offering Level 3 and Level 4 training</cite>, but this training is confirmed for administrators/building leaders rather than all staff, so it is rated in-work.
  • 3.4 [Restorative Justice Practices]: Peer mediation program — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Peer mediation has existed at individual schools, and the district's 2026 action plan explicitly aims to <cite index="64-8">systematize successful local programs such as peer mediation and restorative circles</cite>, confirming it is a local, not yet fully district-wide, practice.
  • 4.1 [Bias Awareness & Mitigation]: Implicit bias training for staff — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). No AAPS document specifically names "implicit bias" training, though the district requires <cite index="14-8">annual diversity and sensitivity training to all staff</cite>, which likely touches on bias; this is rated in-work absent explicit confirmation.
  • 4.3 [Bias Awareness & Mitigation]: Cultural competence checks in hiring — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district reported <cite index="65-9">having diverse employees sit on all hiring committees</cite> and continues to <cite index="69-2">work with and include AAEA Minority Affairs Committee in...recruitment and hiring</cite>, but no formal "cultural competence check" instrument in hiring was confirmed.
  • 7.3 [Professional Development on Equity & Inclusion]: Equity topics in staff meetings/PD — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district maintains a Professional Learning Overview and a standing Board Equity & Inclusion Committee, but specific confirmation that equity topics are embedded in regular all-staff meetings district-wide was not found.
  • 7.4 [Professional Development on Equity & Inclusion]: Participation in equity-focused conferences — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The staffing report states intent to <cite index="14-8">Increase partnerships with universities and organizations that offer our staff additional learning</cite>, but no confirmation of systematic staff participation in external equity-focused conferences was found.
  • 9.1 [Data Collection & Analysis]: Disaggregated discipline data system — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district presented a <cite index="30-6">six‑year analysis...disproportionately borne by Black students, students with disabilities and economically disadvantaged students</cite>, but staff noted the current count was incident-based and <cite index="30-9">committed to follow‑up with disaggregated and per‑student metrics</cite>, indicating the disaggregated data system is still being refined.
  • 9.2 [Data Collection & Analysis]: Regular audits of discipline practices — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Presenters said <cite index="30-10">an annual suspension report will return to the board and staff will incorporate requested analyses</cite>, suggesting a regular audit cadence is being newly established rather than long-standing.
  • 9.4 [Data Collection & Analysis]: Transparent reporting to stakeholders — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Data was presented publicly to the board, but an advocate <cite index="30-8">urged the board to convene a diverse task force to develop a plan and to make school‑level suspension data public</cite>, indicating full transparency to all stakeholders is not yet in place.
  • 10.3 [Student Voice & Leadership]: Students facilitate restorative processes — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Historical reporting shows Skyline students were <cite index="21-11">trained at the Dispute Resolution Center in Ann Arbor</cite> to facilitate restorative processes, but this is school-specific and older evidence, not confirmed as a current district-wide practice.
  • 10.4 [Student Voice & Leadership]: Student-led peer education — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). Peer mediation and peer-support elements exist (e.g., Rising Scholars' <cite index="106-8">10th grade - peer and mentor support</cite>), and the district aims to <cite index="64-8">systematize successful local programs such as peer mediation</cite>, but student-led peer education is not confirmed as uniformly implemented district-wide.
  • 12.3 [Continuous Evaluation & Improvement]: Benchmarking vs. state/national comparators — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). The district produces an annual NWEA benchmark report and compares test scores to <cite index="31-6">state and Washtenaw County averages</cite>, but this benchmarking is academic rather than specifically about discipline-equity comparators.
  • EC5 [Extra Credit]: Newly formed K-12 Student Support Advisory Committee specifically tasked with reducing racial disproportionality in discipline, including students, parents, staff and community partners. — Currently: In-work (1/2 pts). <cite index="132-5">the district has convened a new student support advisory committee composed of staff, students, parents, caregivers and community partners...to identify inequities in disciplinary outcomes and reduce disproportionate suspensions</cite> — a promising bu…

Source Documents Used

Show source documents (11)
DocumentDateLocal CopySource
2016-17 Student Conduct Report2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/board-of-education/reports-to-board-2017-18/2016-17-student-conduct-report
2017-18 Student Conduct Report2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/board-of-education/reports-to-board-2018-19/2017-18-student-conduct-report
Rights & Responsibilities2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/students-families/rights-responsibilities
Rights & Responsibilities - Students, Teachers. Staff, Parents, Guardians2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/fs/pages/20924
AAPS Equity Plan2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/fs/resource-manager/view/fc8e15aa-e23e-49b6-9b8b-8ea4644c15f2
AAPS Equity Plan (2)2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/about-aaps/aaps-equity-plan
AAPS Equity Plan Preview2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/board-of-education/reports-to-board-2018-19/aaps-equity-plan-preview
Equity Plan Update2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/board-of-education/reports-to-board-2022-23/equity-plan-update
Strategic Equity Plan Update2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/superintendent/presentations-reports/strategic-equity-plan-update
Strategic Partnerships and Community Engagement2026Open filehttps://www.a2schools.org/board-of-education/reports-to-board-2022-23/strategic-partnerships-and-community-engagement
Ann Arbor Public Schools Scoring Sheet2026Open filefile:///C:/_CSSD/CSSDWebsite/cssdisc.org_htdocs/DistrictPolicies/Ann_Arbor_Public_Schools/2026/Ann_Arbor_Public_Schools_Scoring_Sheet.xlsx